Lenovo 20J6S0HR00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20J6S0HR00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20J6S0HR00
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200717
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 05 '23 at 15:28
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7440HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 65.2
1-Core 41
2-Core 156
49% 87.2 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 189
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 505E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8854
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
4.2% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 6
5% 7.83 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 0.1
3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.2%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 246 316 296 322 315 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 1,085
Write 676
Mixed 548
SusWrite 315
145% 656 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 28.1
105% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 463
DQ Write 80.8
DQ Mixed 134
134% 226 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 107%
Great: 236%
Liteon CV1-SB128 128GB
29GB free
Firmware: GS72201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 64 81 65 83 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 396
Write 172
Mixed 155
SusWrite 81.6
44% 201 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 25.4
4K Mixed 20.4
78% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 78.8
DQ Mixed 82.3
88% 153 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
36.9% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 12.1
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 9.8
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20J6S0HR00 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20J6S0HR00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback