Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	78.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4000M-$259 7,973 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	50.5% Above average	Memory 76 1-Core 57.4 2-Core 110 51% 81.1 Pts	4-Core 147 8-Core 152 20% 149 Pts	64-Core 153 10% 153 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mz7ge240hmgr-000v3 00FN299 00FN302IBM 240GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CA35 SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 260 259 260 259 256 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	78.2% Very good	Read 457 Write 251 Mixed 218 SusWrite 259 66% 296 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 56.5 4K Mixed 28 105% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 350 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 211 172% 249 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 82%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB 638 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 6GB free, PID 5786 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3 2.9 1.8 2.3 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	3.81% Terrible	Read 17.8 Write 0.5 Mixed 2.2 SusWrite 2.6 5% 5.78 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.81% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8A-PB 1x4GB 3,180 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	27% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 7.7 25% 8.73 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 7.6 24% 8.27 GB/s	Latency 88.2 45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	222x
Radeon HD 8750MAMDBench 6%, 409 samples	2x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x
MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 5,922 samples	6x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	11x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	8x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	7x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16