bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics96.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory31.2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 31.2GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory28.6 GB free of 31.25 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '23 at 07:04
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 79.4
2-Core 155
61% 104 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 631
56% 474 Pts
64-Core 726
45% 726 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Nvidia(10DE 2504) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.8% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 114
Parallax 118
102% 119 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 101
Splatting 86.6
86% 109 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 344GB
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 602 233 381 625 648 387 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 46% Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB Virtual RAM VMW-4096MB Virtual RAM VMW-2048MB Virtual RAM VMW-1024MB Virtual RAM VMW-256MB 31GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 8192, 4096, 2048, 1024, 256 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 58.4
MC Write 52.6
MC Mixed 49.3
153% 53.4 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 17
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 131%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,469 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback