Asus PRIME Z590-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 219%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 218%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics216% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z590-V  (all builds)
Memory42.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '23 at 02:22
Run Duration302 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700KF-$225
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 90.2
1-Core 164
2-Core 324
104% 193 Pts
4-Core 635
8-Core 1,074
104% 854 Pts
64-Core 1,598
99% 1,598 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
EVGA(3842 3982) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
216% Outstanding
Lighting 324
Reflection 284
Parallax 347
264% 318 fps
MRender 356
Gravity 256
Splatting 184
208% 266 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 216%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
239GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 624 412 223 24 68 217 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,450
Write 1,454
Mixed 1,147
SusWrite 261
241% 1,078 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 44.4
146% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,009
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 287
282% 477 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 145%
Great: 237%
PNY CS1311 960GB-$195
782GB free
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 382 429 336 252 320 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 498
Write 434
Mixed 382
SusWrite 339
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 27.7
105% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 191
157% 230 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 108%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
499GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1784 1717 1752 1717 1843 1715 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
278% Outstanding
Read 2,371
Write 1,693
Mixed 1,244
SusWrite 1,755
395% 1,766 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 46.8
156% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,130
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 243
275% 498 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 278%
Great: 425%
Corsair MP600 PRO 2TB
392GB free
Firmware: EIFM21.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3032 2212 967 1076 1066 1025 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,515
Write 1,754
Mixed 1,078
SusWrite 1,563
333% 1,478 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 43.9
139% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 91
DQ Mixed 146
99% 120 MB/s
Poor: 208%
This bench: 204%
Great: 589%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 147 142 145 143 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 155
Write 126
Mixed 103
SusWrite 143
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G30C15U4B.16FE BL8G30C15U4R.M8FE BL16G30C15U4B.16FE BL8G30C15U4R.M8FE 48GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 21.5
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 25.6
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z590-V Builds (Compare 1,914 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 185%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 186%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z590-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,262
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback