ADD TO PC
BUILD

Monster ABRA A5 V13.1

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago.

System	Monster ABRA A5 V13.1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Standard Standard
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190123
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '23 at 22:03
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	Memory 89.6 1-Core 117 2-Core 224 82% 144 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 559 60% 476 Pts	64-Core 594 37% 594 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1D05 1042) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	5.17% Terrible	Lighting 5.4 Reflection 6.8 Parallax 6.3 4% 6.17 fps	MRender 9.1 Gravity 5.5 Splatting 9.4 7% 8 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.17% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Device(1D05 1042) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	30.9% Below average	Lighting 39.5 Reflection 48.4 Parallax 38.9 32% 42.3 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 41.3 Splatting 27.1 28% 35.5 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON SNV2S50 500GB 312 User benchmarks, average bench 196% 226GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBI02102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 545 380 372 311 380 373 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	175% Outstanding	Read 1,790 Write 1,366 Mixed 1,260 SusWrite 393 268% 1,202 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 88.4 4K Mixed 37.6 152% 54.6 MB/s	DQ Read 836 DQ Write 686 DQ Mixed 744 562% 755 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 175% Great: 316%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 480GB 11,256 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 162GB free Firmware: 1.0.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 654 217 217 216 215 249 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	126% Outstanding	Read 1,082 Write 675 Mixed 494 SusWrite 295 141% 636 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 37.6 153% 59.9 MB/s	DQ Read 288 DQ Write 529 DQ Mixed 292 255% 370 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 182%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 0908 TXRUI D48GB-2400 16GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	78.2% Very good	MC Read 29.9 MC Write 30.7 MC Mixed 22.4 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 31.5 SC Mixed 22.7 68% 24 GB/s	Latency 67.7 59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical ABRA A5 V13.1 Builds (Compare 336 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V13.1

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	312x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	24x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	165x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	148x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	23x

SSD
SU800NS38 256GBAdataBench 86%, 10,211 samples	73x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	39x
SSDSCKKW256G8 256GBIntelBench 90%, 4,898 samples	34x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	74x
CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 1x8GBCrucialBench 40%, 1,339 samples	31x
CT8G4SFS8266.M8FB 1x8GBCrucialBench 42%, 508 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback