Digma EVE 15 C423 NR5158DXW01

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemDigma EVE 15 C423 NR5158DXW01  (all builds)
MotherboardIDH IDH
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 04 '23 at 10:58
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 56.5
1-Core 64.2
2-Core 131
48% 83.8 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 383
39% 315 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Device(2782 1100) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.10.34.01
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.07% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 3.6
2% 2.93 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.07%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
C500 512GB
453GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H210928a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 336 329 368 369 373 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 379
Write 369
Mixed 363
SusWrite 353
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 22.7
86% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 200
150% 199 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.2% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 17
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 13.1
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EVE 15 C423 NR5158DXW01 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Digma EVE 15 C423 NR5158DXW01

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback