HP 260-p026

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 260-p026  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81B4
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171215
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateJan 03 '23 at 23:17
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100T-$108
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 80.1
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 153
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 220
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 81B4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
4.4% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 4
Parallax 5.6
4% 4.77 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 8.2
6% 6.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.4%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SA510 2.5 500GB
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 52020100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 349 324 362 321 361 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 401
Write 390
Mixed 367
SusWrite 337
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 35.5
121% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 289
230% 322 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.9% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 19.2
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 18.6
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 260-p026 Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP 260-p026

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $108
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback