HP Z420 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemHP Z420 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1589
Memory57 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160601
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 03 '23 at 20:27
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 74
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 173
63% 110 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 480
50% 404 Pts
64-Core 664
41% 664 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 3609) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 184
Parallax 173
136% 175 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 172
Splatting 121
114% 140 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256MAY-1AH1ZABHA 256GB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M504
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 217 217 223 183 167 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 398
Write 380
Mixed 283
SusWrite 209
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 28.8
96% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 221
173% 241 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 105%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
97GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 177 178 188 193 149 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.3% Average
Read 233
Write 142
Mixed 174
SusWrite 178
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 18.3
66% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 80.4
DQ Mixed 117
91% 127 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 76%
Kxg60znv256g NVMe TOSHIBA 256GB
126GB free
Firmware: 10604103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 258 256 273 279 285 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 340
Write 275
Mixed 304
SusWrite 270
67% 297 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 30.7
99% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 296
222% 298 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 242%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
909GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 179 180 180 179 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 138
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 178
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
888GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 175 176 185 184 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 177
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 179
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
811GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 177 177 185 187 188 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 152
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 179
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18KSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M391B1G73QH0-CMA 18KSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M391B1G73QH0-CMA Samsung M391B1G73QH0-CMA 18KSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M391B1G73QH0-CMA 18KSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 64GB
1600, 1866, 1600, 1866, 1866, 1600, 1866, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.1% Excellent
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 32.4
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 11.6
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z420 Workstation Builds (Compare 5,744 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z420 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback