HP 870-255xt

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics65.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemHP 870-255xt  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 830C
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '23 at 14:10
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 92.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 204
80% 136 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 559
59% 474 Pts
64-Core 552
34% 552 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$296
Asus(1043 86F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.9% Good
Lighting 78.3
Reflection 72
Parallax 80.9
64% 77.1 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 72.3
Splatting 66.5
70% 89.1 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 2TB SSD
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900702
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 418 443 452 451 450 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 353
Write 437
Mixed 409
SusWrite 418
92% 404 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 42.8
150% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 283
233% 333 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 102%
Great: 123%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
286GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 131 133 134 134 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 153
Write 151
Mixed 97.5
SusWrite 132
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 109%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$73
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 150 153 154 156 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 152
Write 149
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 153
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 029E CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 029E CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 029E CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 26.4
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 25.3
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870-255xt Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: HP 870-255xt

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $299
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback