Acer Aspire M5910

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	41.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

16 months ago, 16 months ago.

System	Acer Aspire M5910 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire M5910
Memory	3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100517
Uptime	3.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '23 at 12:39
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	38%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	48% Average	Memory 67.6 1-Core 70.1 2-Core 116 52% 84.4 Pts	4-Core 164 8-Core 175 22% 170 Pts	64-Core 168 10% 168 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Gigabyte(1458 3FCB) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.8% Average	Lighting 54 Reflection 55 Parallax 47.4 44% 52.1 fps	MRender 42.1 Gravity 50.1 Splatting 45.4 38% 45.9 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 164 200 216 238 239 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60.7% Good	Read 228 Write 220 Mixed 196 SusWrite 202 48% 211 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 49.3 4K Mixed 27.4 99% 33.8 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 177 139% 191 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 128%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 320GB 718 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 297GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 122 126 133 135 136 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	73.9% Very good	Read 130 Write 71.7 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 127 69% 94.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 206% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 131%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GU512303EP0202 3x2GB 207 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 11.6 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 7.9 22% 7.57 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire M5910 Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M5910

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	68x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	59x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples	12x
GeForce GT 320NvidiaBench 3%, 2,109 samples	9x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	9x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	9x
X150 480GBEmtecBench 75%, 1,954 samples	7x

RAM
CT25664BA1339A.M16 859B CT25664BA1339A.M16 0198 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 0198 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 8GBUnknownBench 34%, 7 samples	7x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 80CE M378B5273DH0-CH9 830B NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 830B NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 12GBUnknownBench 35%, 7 samples	6x
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 0198 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 859B CT25664BA1339A.M16 859B CT25664BA1339A.M16 8GBUnknownBench 37%, 7 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $301

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16