Asus K52Je

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus K52Je  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K52Je
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '23 at 12:06
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 450
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
41.3% Average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 57
2-Core 103
45% 73.7 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 132
17% 130 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Asus(1043 1BF2) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.23% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 1.9
1% 2.07 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1
Splatting 2
1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.23%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$65
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 134 85 0 0 70 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.8% Poor
Read 41.5
Write 74.3
Mixed 13.4
SusWrite 72.9
12% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 17.4
55% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 36.7
DQ Write 67.4
DQ Mixed 42.5
35% 48.9 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT125S6BFR8C-G7 06C1 SSZ3128M8-EAEEF 4GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
23.7% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10
23% 8.17 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K52Je Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K52Je

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback