Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	95.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

Motherboard	Parallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory	3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20221202
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '23 at 01:27
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 22 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	56.6% Above average	Memory 71.2 1-Core 87.6 2-Core 167 62% 109 Pts	4-Core 241 8-Core 257 33% 249 Pts	64-Core 209 13% 209 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM) 2,233 User benchmarks, average bench 26% ParallelsVM(1AB8 0400) 2GB Driver: prl_umdd.dll Ver. 18.1.1.53328 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	11.6% Very poor	Lighting 14.5 Reflection 19.4 Parallax 17.6 12% 17.2 fps	MRender 18.3 Gravity 4.7 Splatting 17 11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 47%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Parallels Virtual NVMe Disk 275GB 1,371 User benchmarks, average bench 180% 235GB free (System drive) Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 189 203 245 212 215 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	Read 1,524 Write 1012 Mixed 1,177 SusWrite 227 219% 985 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 15.1 4K Mixed 15.5 52% 15.4 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 72.1 DQ Mixed 102 76% 104 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 308%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 667, 667 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	MC Read 22.3 MC Write 23.5 MC Mixed 20.4 63% 22.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 9.1 28% 9.8 GB/s	Latency 98.6 41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,058x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	827x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	432x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325