MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 231%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 265%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics252% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200611
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 03 '23 at 00:41
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 84.4
1-Core 140
2-Core 283
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 1,090
98% 825 Pts
64-Core 2,199
136% 2,199 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
CLim: 3360 MHz, MLim: 5801 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
252% Outstanding
Lighting 343
Reflection 439
Parallax 455
280% 413 fps
MRender 530
Gravity 389
Splatting 266
309% 395 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 252%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,527
Write 2,401
Mixed 1,521
478% 2,150 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 85.1
280% 99.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,269
DQ Write 922
DQ Mixed 1,096
819% 1,096 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
WDC WDS100T2B0C 1TB
254GB free
Firmware: 211210WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 353 357 358 354 352 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 372
Write 357
Mixed 369
SusWrite 356
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 64
197% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 371
DQ Mixed 525
355% 429 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 116%
Great: 269%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
494GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 240 241 242 239 239 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 452
Mixed 438
SusWrite 241
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 51.1
188% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 370
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 108%
Great: 137%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
283GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 240 241 242 240 239 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 456
Write 438
Mixed 397
SusWrite 241
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 93.8
4K Mixed 57.3
181% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 370
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
264GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 97 97 95 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 83
Write 83.4
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 96.4
58% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
131% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 43.5
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 39.7
115% 40.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 36.4
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 109%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,943 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $469
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback