Dell Precision Tower 7910

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics75.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7910
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7910  (all builds)
Memory59.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150926
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 02 '23 at 22:13
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 67.5
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 170
62% 109 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 648
55% 476 Pts
64-Core 2,533
157% 2,533 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.7% Very good
Lighting 95
Reflection 112
Parallax 99.3
77% 102 fps
MRender 91.7
Gravity 93.8
Splatting 82.3
72% 89.3 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256 256GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 33 29 42 32 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 96%
Hitachi HUS726020AL 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: T7J7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 189 191 190 187 191 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 189
Mixed 92.7
SusWrite 189
121% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
164% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 4x16GB
4 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
67% Good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 24
72% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.8
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7910 Builds (Compare 1,182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback