Asus P8P67 DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67 DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 02 '23 at 12:45
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 96.4
1-Core 115
2-Core 188
80% 133 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 558
58% 469 Pts
64-Core 565
35% 565 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Dell(1028 3718) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
154% Outstanding
Lighting 205
Reflection 198
Parallax 222
167% 208 fps
MRender 259
Gravity 205
Splatting 165
167% 210 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 154%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 240GB-$141
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: OC34L5TM Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 964
Write 586
Mixed 414
144% 655 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 30.7
112% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 429
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 82.8
138% 270 MB/s
Poor: 84% Great: 159%
Samsung 860 EVO mSATA 500GB
5GB free
Firmware: RVT42B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 297
Write 119
Mixed 169
43% 195 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 35.3
4K Mixed 26.6
87% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 137
105% 145 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 123%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
100GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 132 132 133 129 126 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.6% Below average
Read 231
Write 141
Mixed 161
SusWrite 127
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 20.6
4K Mixed 17.1
58% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 84.7
DQ Mixed 115
82% 107 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 87%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 1TB-$50
36GB free
Firmware: CV12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 125 133 139 137 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 166
Write 100
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 129
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 119%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$71
176GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 42 42 41 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
27% Poor
Read 52.2
Write 50.9
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 41.4
34% 46.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
60.5% Good
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 18.8
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 20.2
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 52.4
76% 52.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,069 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 DELUXE - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $713
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback