HP 500-490nf

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 500-490nf  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 02 '23 at 11:14
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 100
2-Core 182
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 466
50% 399 Pts
64-Core 485
30% 485 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2189 MHz, MLim: 1902 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Lighting 42.6
Reflection 42.1
Parallax 39.3
35% 41.3 fps
MRender 34.9
Gravity 42.8
Splatting 28.4
28% 35.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M550 256GB-$152
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 340 268 233 233 221 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 401
Write 418
Mixed 297
SusWrite 276
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 30.4
105% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 231
201% 299 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 113%
Jmicron Generic 1TB
749GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 347 308 92 198 360 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 376
Write 76.2
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 234
41% 188 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 23.4
4K Mixed 0.9
38% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 45.2
DQ Mixed 0.9
26% 64.2 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
284GB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 151 147 150 168 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 138
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 155
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 100%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 16.5
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 18.6
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-490nf Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-490nf

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback