| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 85.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-K X (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170720 |
| Uptime | 16.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 02 '23 at 10:57 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | KOR-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69.6%
Good
|
75% 130 Pts
|
38% 284 Pts
|
20% 316 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
Nvidia(10DE 1F08) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
85.2%
Excellent
|
87% 99.7 fps
|
82% 103 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba Q300 Pro 128GB-$76
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JURA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 49 47 40 42 42 MB/s
|
48.2%
Average
|
37% 168 MB/s
|
77% 31.9 MB/s
|
116% 191 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
295GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 110 109 107 108 108 MB/s
|
61.9%
Good
|
71% 97.3 MB/s
|
170% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
66.5%
Good
|
66% 23.3 GB/s
|
58% 20.2 GB/s
|
59% 67.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-K X Builds (Compare 33 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-K X
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7500Intel $88Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 11x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 7x |
| Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 4x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 3x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $172 |