Asrock Z790 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 488%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 662%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 124%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics414% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive473% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock Z790 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory119.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 02 '23 at 04:43
Run Duration444 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$461
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
124% Outstanding
Memory 75.1
1-Core 231
2-Core 461
130% 256 Pts
4-Core 923
8-Core 1,707
157% 1,315 Pts
64-Core 4,326
268% 4,326 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 124%
Great: 135%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,756
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
414% Outstanding
Lighting 673
Reflection 617
Parallax 800
549% 697 fps
MRender 556
Gravity 587
Splatting 314
380% 486 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 414%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$121
545GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3641 1822 1854 1804 1983 2036 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
473% Outstanding
Read 2,387
Write 4,386
Mixed 3,515
SusWrite 2,190
709% 3,120 MB/s
4K Read 100
4K Write 310
4K Mixed 151
509% 187 MB/s
DQ Read 2,106
DQ Write 1,734
DQ Mixed 1,922
1,439% 1,921 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 473%
Great: 521%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$121
931GB free
Firmware: 0B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4109 4279 3679 1710 1704 1703 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
516% Outstanding
Read 3101
Write 4,370
Mixed 3,370
SusWrite 2,864
776% 3,426 MB/s
4K Read 74.6
4K Write 263
4K Mixed 119
405% 152 MB/s
DQ Read 2,240
DQ Write 1,887
DQ Mixed 2,055
1,542% 2,061 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 516%
Great: 521%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$121
705GB free
Firmware: 0B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4276 4300 3516 1552 1527 1518 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
514% Outstanding
Read 3,098
Write 4,356
Mixed 3,317
SusWrite 2,782
767% 3,388 MB/s
4K Read 74.9
4K Write 277
4K Mixed 119
413% 157 MB/s
DQ Read 2,267
DQ Write 1,901
DQ Mixed 2,059
1,549% 2,076 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 514%
Great: 521%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$121
931GB free
Firmware: 0B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4339 4353 3503 1683 1686 1683 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
514% Outstanding
Read 3,073
Write 4316
Mixed 3,336
SusWrite 2,874
770% 3,400 MB/s
4K Read 73.4
4K Write 277
4K Mixed 114
404% 155 MB/s
DQ Read 2,220
DQ Write 1,885
DQ Mixed 2049
1,536% 2,051 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 514%
Great: 521%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB
115GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 387
Write 60.5
Mixed 86.5
164% 178 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 2.8
933% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 17
DQ Write 23.3
DQ Mixed 2.7
947% 14.3 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6000J3040G324x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
122% Outstanding
MC Read 46.6
MC Write 47
MC Mixed 44.8
132% 46.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 42.8
SC Mixed 29.1
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 119%
This bench: 122%
Great: 186%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z790 Taichi Builds (Compare 248 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 453%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 596%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z790 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $2,371
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback