Shinelon CN85S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemShinelon CN85S  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1
Memory0.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161213
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 01 '23 at 00:33
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Memory 14
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 167
43% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 287
41% 302 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 850A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.59% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 38.3
Parallax 4.3
1% 14.5 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.59%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SNAT128G1122 128GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2333000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 157 137 54 42 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 297
Write 166
Mixed 155
SusWrite 96.1
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 7.4
43% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 74.3
68% 103 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
306GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 97 111 117 113 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 85.6
Write 40
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 109
52% 71 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.6
174% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 56%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS8213.M8FA 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
25% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 8.2
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 7.9
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 368
11% 368 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 25%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CN85S Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Shinelon CN85S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback