Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-5257U 3,465 User benchmarks, average bench 55% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Memory 53.5 1-Core 84.7 2-Core 154 54% 97.6 Pts	4-Core 208 8-Core 224 28% 216 Pts	64-Core 227 14% 227 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 6100 (Mobile) 5,403 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Device(1E50 8002) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	3.77% Terrible	Lighting 4.9 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 6.4 4% 4.23 fps	MRender 3.2 Gravity 5.4 Splatting 3.7 3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.77% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Faspeed K7N8-256GF 256GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: HAFEA2.0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 248 Write 92 Mixed 113 33% 151 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 15 4K Mixed 5.3 32% 10.5 MB/s	DQ Read 32 DQ Write 31.3 DQ Mixed 25.4 21% 29.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ASBD308GB-WIN 1x8GB 96 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	22.4% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 6.7 23% 7.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 5.5 16% 5.43 GB/s	Latency 148 27% 148 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	494x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	484x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	464x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,372x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	492x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	356x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87