MSI X299 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7A95)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A95
MotherboardMSI X299 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7A95)  (all builds)
Memory19.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170926
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 13 '17 at 13:06
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$206
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 79.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 253
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 765
77% 623 Pts
64-Core 1,036
64% 1,036 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$29
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 508
Write 215
Mixed 306
75% 343 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 7.01
86% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 5.9
48% 111 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 86%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
971GB free
Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 71.8
Write 73.4
Mixed 58.4
51% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 2.16
4K Mixed 0.61
136% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 68%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
791GB free
Firmware: AX1E1A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 81.9
Write 87.6
Mixed 81.9
63% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.18
58% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 51.9
MC Mixed 25.1
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 9.8
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7A95) Builds (Compare 439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X299 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7A95)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $791
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback