Acer Nitro AN517-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro AN517-54  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Kamiq_TLS
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220622
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '22 at 21:54
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
65% Good
Memory 62.1
1-Core 124
2-Core 216
73% 134 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 553
57% 459 Pts
64-Core 697
43% 697 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 65%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Acer(1025 1544) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1274
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.1% Below average
Lighting 41.3
Reflection 48.7
Parallax 40.3
34% 43.4 fps
MRender 51.8
Gravity 39.3
Splatting 39.3
35% 43.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 45%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IM2P33F8ABR2-512GB 512GB
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0513A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 972 1078 626 1037 626 720 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,335
Write 1,032
Mixed 832
SusWrite 843
226% 1,010 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 19.5
140% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 746
DQ Write 414
DQ Mixed 490
389% 550 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 171%
Great: 279%
WDC WD50 00BPVT-00HXZT1 500GB
30GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1
Write 1
Mixed 1
SusWrite 1.1
1% 1.02 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Mixed 0
180% 16.2 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SMS4WEC8C1K0446FCG 1x8GB
1 of 8 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
43.6% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 13.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 12.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN517-54 Builds (Compare 3,477 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Acer Nitro AN517-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback