Acer Aspire T3-715

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics97.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire T3-715  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire T3-715
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160510
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 30 '22 at 16:11
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 90.2
2-Core 177
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 308
42% 309 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.3% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 138
Parallax 182
100% 148 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 138
Splatting 93
93% 116 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3128GG2 128GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.R
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 378
Write 62.7
Mixed 92.3
38% 178 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 17.6
82% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 64.2
88% 167 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
697GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 147 150 151 160 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 133
Write 115
Mixed 91
SusWrite 152
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
39.9% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 12.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 11.9
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire T3-715 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Acer Aspire T3-715

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $179
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback