HP ProLiant ML350 G6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics74.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory108GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 108GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProLiant ML350 G6  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory97.2 GB free of 108 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150816
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateDec 30 '22 at 08:19
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
Proc 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 167
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 508
52% 419 Pts
64-Core 1,087
67% 1,087 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
MSI(1462 375C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.7% Very good
Lighting 94.9
Reflection 94
Parallax 86
77% 91.6 fps
MRender 96.5
Gravity 88.5
Splatting 74.9
70% 86.6 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 300GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.64
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,111
Write 992
Mixed 1,045
234% 1,049 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 48.6
170% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 243
180% 242 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 91%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 3.5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 6.64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 526 458 458 458 455 459 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 69% Great: 81%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 6.64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 228 227 226 226 227 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 36% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 108GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 8192, 4096, 8192, 8192, 4096, 2048, 8192, 4096, 8192, 8192, 4096, 8192, 8192, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.6% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 11.6
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.9
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant ML350 G6 Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: HP ProLiant ML350 G6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $64
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback