MSI 970A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7992)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7992
MotherboardMSI 970A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7992)  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '22 at 01:57
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9370-$183
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 68.5
2-Core 125
56% 91.4 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 348
36% 288 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.3% Above average
Lighting 63.3
Reflection 61.7
Parallax 86.6
52% 70.5 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 71.6
Splatting 46
48% 59.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 328 333 355 365 364 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 59%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
136GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 83 86 84 85 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 84.3
Write 84.7
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 83.8
56% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 69%
WD WD3200AVCS-632DY1 320GB
165GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 64 63 64 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 58.7
Write 58.4
Mixed 48.1
SusWrite 63.6
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 50%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
181GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 116 116 118 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 106
Write 111
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 116
72% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 74%
ST950042 0AS 500GB
350GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 50
Write 27.2
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 28.1
40% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
42% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BD160BJ.M8F 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.5% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 17.1
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 12.6
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7992) Builds (Compare 193 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7992)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback