TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Precision 7820 Tower

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 193%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 263%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics238% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemDell Precision 7820 Tower  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0804P1
Memory55.4 GB free of 96 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221114
Uptime3 Days
Run DateDec 30 '22 at 01:42
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R
CPU0, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 81.3
1-Core 111
2-Core 223
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 886
79% 668 Pts
64-Core 3,157
195% 3,157 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 82.5%
 Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-Ti
Nvidia(10DE 1618) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
238% Outstanding
Lighting 346
Reflection 341
Parallax 397
282% 362 fps
MRender 407
Gravity 338
Splatting 216
251% 320 fps
Poor: 205% ↑
This bench: 238%
 Great: 247%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PC711 SK hy 1TB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1131 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,187
Write 2,025
Mixed 1,522
425% 1,912 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 58.9
197% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 579
DQ Write 475
DQ Mixed 530
396% 528 MB/s
Poor: 167% Great: 373%
Nvme PC711 SK hy 1TB
469GB free
Firmware: 1131 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2135 2170 1635 1427 1438 1448 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 2,196
Write 2,156
Mixed 1,538
SusWrite 1,709
427% 1,900 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 60.7
203% 69.6 MB/s
DQ Read 657
DQ Write 531
DQ Mixed 585
441% 591 MB/s
Poor: 167% ↑
This bench: 282%
 Great: 373%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 342 378 383 393 407 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Microsoft Storage Space Device 18TB
5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 212 222 138 208 214 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.3% Poor
Read 251
Write 231
Mixed 130
SusWrite 202
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 13.7
4K Mixed 0.3
14% 6.03 MB/s
DQ Read 2
DQ Write 3.9
DQ Mixed 5.3
3% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑
This bench: 26.3%
 Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K43DB3-CWE 6x16GB
6 of 12 slots used
96GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2934 MHz
Performing below potential (87th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
178% Outstanding
MC Read 68.7
MC Write 89.4
MC Mixed 66
213% 74.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 10
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 88% ↑
This bench: 178%
 Great: 179%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Precision 7820 Tower Builds (Compare 738 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Dell Precision 7820 Tower

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 41101stBench 62%, 546 samples58x
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 41141stBench 63%, 670 samples51x
CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 51181stBench 65%, 220 samples34x
GPU
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples77x
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples52x
RTX A4000NvidiaBench 132%, 4,246 samples39x
SSD
PC711 SK hy 1TBNvmeBench 274%, 247 samples22x
PM9A1 Samsu 1TBNvmeBench 280%, 246 samples17x
PM9A1 Samsu 512GBNvmeBench 264%, 261 samples16x
RAM
HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK 4x8GBHynixBench 84%, 1,278 samples47x
HMA81GR7CJR8N-XN 4x8GBHynixBench 72%, 107 samples35x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G6D1 4x8GBMicronBench 76%, 499 samples29x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback