Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 90FN000EUK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.63% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90FN000EUK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 0x36C017AA
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160908
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '22 at 22:07
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$83
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 72
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 128
58% 95 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 144
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 137
8% 137 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 376D) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.63% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 7.8
Parallax 8.4
7% 8.13 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 7
7% 8.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.63%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
893GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 94 104 132 182 186 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 174
Write 144
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 139
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 112%
TDK LoR TF10 8GB
4GB free, PID 070a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 19.9
Write 17.8
Mixed 3
16% 13.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 18.9
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 19.2
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90FN000EUK Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90FN000EUK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback