Positivo VJFE42F11X-XXXXXX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemPositivo VJFE42F11X-XXXXXX  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo VJFE-CL
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201207
Uptime12 Days
Run DateDec 29 '22 at 21:24
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 66.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 218
71% 130 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 315
34% 273 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.91% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 6.3
4% 5.13 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 8.8
6% 6.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.91%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CL1-8D256 256GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CT20903 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 352 334 203 229 211 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 1,471
Write 627
Mixed 348
SusWrite 278
149% 681 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 18.9
144% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 628
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 218
204% 330 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 134%
Great: 170%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1P26KC8T1-BAAS 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.1% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 9.2
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 8.9
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VJFE42F11X-XXXXXX Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo VJFE42F11X-XXXXXX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback