Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '22 at 19:54
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7920X-$209
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 69
1-Core 116
2-Core 237
76% 141 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 906
81% 686 Pts
64-Core 1,847
114% 1,847 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 78%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp
Nvidia(10DE 123E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
112% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 184
Parallax 194
135% 181 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 186
Splatting 0.2
76% 106 fps
Poor: 114%
This bench: 112%
Great: 140%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB-$108
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 138 161 151 94 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 442
Write 404
Mixed 308
SusWrite 145
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 37.8
136% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 236
200% 293 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 165 168 167 168 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 179
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 168
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 107%
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 320GB
101GB free, PID 5021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 40 41 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 40.9
Write 40.8
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 40.7
51% 37.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.5% Above average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 15.7
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 10.7
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,771 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $541
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback