Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop TP420IA_TM420IA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop TP420IA_TM420IA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TP420IA
Memory13.9 GB free of 20 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '22 at 19:48
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
48% Average
Memory 63.6
1-Core 55
2-Core 109
46% 75.9 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 214
26% 199 Pts
64-Core 250
16% 250 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 11F2) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.22.09
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
6.95% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 14.6
Parallax 14
5% 11.6 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 11
Splatting 15.5
10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.95%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GB
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 189 185 190 203 202 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 501
Write 199
Mixed 275
SusWrite 193
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 16.4
55% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 93.2
DQ Mixed 148
115% 162 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 206%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FRS 20GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
44.3% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 12
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop TP420IA_TM420IA Builds (Compare 155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop TP420IA_TM420IA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback