TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Positivo C14CR01

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo C14CR01  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo C14CR01
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121001
Uptime13 Days
Run DateDec 29 '22 at 18:28
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 77.4
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 116
55% 88.7 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 188
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 54.7%
 Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Device(1297 2027) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.93% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 3
Parallax 2.7
3% 3.13 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.27 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 2.93%
 Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Walram 256GB 256GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HCS1A25E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 261 173 158 60 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 440
Write 374
Mixed 346
SusWrite 168
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 36.8
4K Mixed 9.3
64% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 13.7
61% 133 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑
This bench: 54.7%
 Great: 176%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown.C346G.C850C 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.6% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 6.7
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 20% ↑
This bench: 23.6%
 Great: 33%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical C14CR01 Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo C14CR01

CPU
Core i5-2450MIntel  $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples17x
Core i3-3110MIntel  $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples12x
Core i3-2330MIntel  $150Bench 47%, 20,066 samples12x
GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples26x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples23x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples18x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples5x
240GB 240GBSSDBench 64%, 5,968 samples4x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston  $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples3x
RAM
76.B346G.C280C 2x4GBUnknownBench 40%, 57 samples6x
SH564128FH8NZPHSCR 2x4GBSmartBench 42%, 520 samples5x
76.A346G.C270C 0416 76.B346G.C280C 6GBUnknownBench 36%, 30 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback