Lenovo 10A60019MS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10A60019MS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140126
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateDec 29 '22 at 16:36
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 48%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 73.8
1-Core 57.5
2-Core 148
54% 92.9 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 252
32% 244 Pts
64-Core 260
16% 260 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 1952 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Lighting 38.9
Reflection 43.5
Parallax 39.1
32% 40.5 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 29.3
29% 36.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 83 17 48 80 42 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36% Below average
Read 158
Write 99
Mixed 117
SusWrite 64.3
24% 110 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 16.3
65% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 96.1
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 133
100% 132 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
400GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 191 190 195 199 196 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 165
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 191
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX M378B5273DH0-CK0 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
47.1% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 14.9
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 14.8
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10A60019MS Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Lenovo 10A60019MS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $362
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback