Asrock QC-B365-TDIMM

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock QC-B365-TDIMM (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190927
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 29 '22 at 03:30
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100-$137 7,621 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Memory 71.1 1-Core 121 2-Core 244 79% 145 Pts	4-Core 386 8-Core 402 52% 394 Pts	64-Core 407 25% 407 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3) 32,403 User benchmarks, average bench 5% ASRock(1849 3E91) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2112 Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	4.97% Terrible	Lighting 5.8 Reflection 3.7 Parallax 6.4 5% 5.3 fps	MRender 0.3 Gravity 7.9 Splatting 10 6% 6.07 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.97% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GB 4,594 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0AL6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 201 250 250 254 254 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	76% Very good	Read 438 Write 260 Mixed 197 SusWrite 238 63% 284 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 59.1 4K Mixed 23.9 100% 36.2 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 254 DQ Mixed 79.6 120% 230 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 91%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 768GB free Firmware: AX1P1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 100 101 101 101 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	41.5% Average	Read 45.1 Write 51.7 Mixed 26.2 SusWrite 99.5 40% 55.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung CL16-16-16 D4-2133 1x8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	MC Read 12 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 9.3 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 8.5 25% 8.73 GB/s	Latency 98.9 40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical QC-B365-TDIMM Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock QC-B365-TDIMM

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $249Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	2x
Core i3-9100Intel $137Bench 80%, 7,621 samples	2x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 660-TiNvidia $362Bench 26%, 42,960 samples	2x
HD 5870AMDBench 19%, 10,176 samples	1x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)IntelBench 5%, 32,403 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 70%, 4,594 samples	2x
860 Evo 2TBSamsung $247Bench 113%, 44,466 samples	1x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	1x

RAM
CL16-16-16 D4-2133 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 18 samples	2x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $67Bench 85%, 86,372 samples	2x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 77%, 2,402 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $611

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16