Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 18% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4250U-$499 1,765 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Memory 16.8 1-Core 23.8 2-Core 52 17% 30.9 Pts	4-Core 67.8 8-Core 89.5 10% 78.7 Pts	64-Core 94.7 6% 94.7 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5000 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 6,906 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Intel(8086 2054) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	2.75% Terrible	Lighting 3.3 Reflection 2.2 Parallax 5.4 3% 3.63 fps	MRender 3.2 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 4.4 3% 3.37 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.75% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO mSATA 250GB 1,851 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT43B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 164 214 238 239 268 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.4% Below average	Read 234 Write 220 Mixed 199 SusWrite 225 50% 220 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 9.9 4K Mixed 6.4 23% 7.63 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 70.3 DQ Mixed 76.8 62% 88 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 121%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BF160B.C16F 1315 CT102464BF160B.C16 12GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	18.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 7.4 20% 7.03 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 4.3 11% 3.97 GB/s	Latency 345 12% 345 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,049x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	826x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	427x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16