Colorful H510M-T M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemColorful H510M-T M.2  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful H510M-T M.2
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '22 at 19:01
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$113
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 82
1-Core 145
2-Core 285
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 828
86% 690 Pts
64-Core 953
59% 953 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$253
Nvidia(10DE 1530) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 129
Parallax 125
114% 131 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 100
Splatting 96.5
91% 113 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S500G 500GB
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBI02102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 668 378 380 385 382 384 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 2,276
Write 1,407
Mixed 1,376
SusWrite 429
304% 1,372 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 42.5
185% 68.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,141
DQ Write 1,066
DQ Mixed 750
660% 986 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 222%
Great: 323%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Golden Empire CL16-20-20 D4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.7% Above average
MC Read 16
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 11.9
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 36.2
SC Mixed 19.4
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H510M-T M.2 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

System: Colorful H510M-T M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $363
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback