Asus P8H67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics67.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '22 at 18:29
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 85%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 129
57% 92 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 397
38% 313 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.9% Good
Lighting 89.4
Reflection 85.4
Parallax 76
73% 83.6 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 78.8
Splatting 70.2
58% 71.1 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 76 65 64 59 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 133
Write 108
Mixed 116
SusWrite 67.8
24% 106 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 10.9
73% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 30
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 31
35% 56.5 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 61%
Samsung HD250HJ 250GB
65GB free
Firmware: FH100-06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 73 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 53.6
Write 61.4
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 73.4
42% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 56%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
346GB free
Firmware: 1AA01110
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 62 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 69.8
Write 46.3
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 62.4
41% 56.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-666.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
26.7% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 8.1
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 7.6
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 982 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $416
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback