HP Engage Flex Pro-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Engage Flex Pro-C  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8476
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '22 at 10:12
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 119
2-Core 224
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 721
67% 561 Pts
64-Core 875
54% 875 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia T400
Nvidia(10DE 1489) 2GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 527.27
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 23.9
Parallax 19.7
17% 21.6 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 22.5
18% 22.7 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDKBA512TFH-1BC1AABHA 512GB
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1790 1141 713 703 704 693 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 2,194
Write 1,883
Mixed 1,724
SusWrite 957
378% 1,690 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 53.1
170% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 729
DQ Write 501
DQ Mixed 636
469% 622 MB/s
Poor: 135%
This bench: 227%
Great: 403%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.7% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 22.9
82% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 23.4
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Engage Flex Pro-C Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Engage Flex Pro-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $166
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback