Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2609 0 759 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	53% Above average	Memory 72.7 1-Core 62 2-Core 123 52% 85.9 Pts	4-Core 192 8-Core 206 26% 199 Pts	64-Core 195 12% 195 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 353.30 Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Lighting 14.4 Reflection 18.1 Parallax 18.1 12% 16.9 fps	MRender 21.6 Gravity 14.2 Splatting 15.3 14% 17 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 13%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 256GB-$225 3,223 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: HTLAN103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 304 248 265 252 291 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Read 362 Write 314 Mixed 317 SusWrite 268 71% 315 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 33.4 4K Mixed 24.3 68% 23.4 MB/s	DQ Read 295 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 195 154% 218 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5273DH0- 4x4GB 97 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	61.4% Good	MC Read 24 MC Write 25.6 MC Mixed 21.8 68% 23.8 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 9.2 28% 9.7 GB/s	Latency 95.2 42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 109%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon E5-2609 0IntelBench 56%, 759 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	1x

SSD
HG5d Q Series 256GBToshiba $225Bench 82%, 3,223 samples	1x

RAM
M393B5273DH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 87%, 97 samples	1x

Value: 6% - Terrible

Total price: $225

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16