Asus TUF B360-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B360-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '22 at 19:27
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 88.7
2-Core 143
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 438
47% 375 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
XFX(1EAE 6601) ≥ 4GB; XFX RX 6700 XT 12gb
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 128
Parallax 284
105% 180 fps
MRender 238
Gravity 144
Splatting 198
158% 194 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 119%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 78 82 82 50 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 462
Write 277
Mixed 363
SusWrite 96.4
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 8.8
96% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 204
154% 208 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$72
296GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 122 119 119 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 70.3
Write 82.5
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 119
62% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
KLEVV KD48GU880-32N220T 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 24
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 20.4
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $304
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback