Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$90 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Memory 84.6 1-Core 56.1 2-Core 115 54% 85.1 Pts	4-Core 182 8-Core 223 26% 203 Pts	64-Core 164 10% 164 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140 15,701 User benchmarks, average bench 17% EVGA(3842 3658) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Lighting 19.5 Reflection 23 Parallax 26.8 16% 23.1 fps	MRender 28.1 Gravity 25.3 Splatting 22.4 20% 25.3 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 18%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT08B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 71 70 66 69 69 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.7% Below average	Read 249 Write 95.4 Mixed 93.2 SusWrite 70.3 28% 127 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 37 4K Mixed 14.6 59% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 215 DQ Write 78.5 DQ Mixed 51.6 63% 115 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 1x4GB 246 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.5% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 2.9 14% 4.97 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 2.1 13% 4.6 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	6x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $494