Lenovo 10M9000CMT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10M9000CMT  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3102
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200918
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateDec 27 '22 at 14:26
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 123
2-Core 212
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 624
60% 497 Pts
64-Core 626
39% 626 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 86B6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.5% Average
Lighting 53.3
Reflection 56.7
Parallax 47.8
43% 52.6 fps
MRender 41.3
Gravity 50
Splatting 46.2
38% 45.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
295GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 611100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1694 1659 1451 956 1097 925 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 1,755
Write 1,835
Mixed 1,612
SusWrite 1297
366% 1,625 MB/s
4K Read 56.2
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 63.9
215% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 897
DQ Write 540
DQ Mixed 683
518% 707 MB/s
Poor: 264%
This bench: 248%
Great: 573%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
309GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 74 73 74 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 75
Write 68.3
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 72.9
50% 67.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
76.8% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 22.4
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 24.1
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10M9000CMT Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 10M9000CMT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $547Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback