Gigabyte GA-M61P-S3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-M61P-S3  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080310
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 27 '22 at 11:39
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 7750
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Memory 56.5
1-Core 31.9
2-Core 63.4
33% 50.6 Pts
4-Core 46.1
8-Core 50.8
6% 48.4 Pts
64-Core 48.2
3% 48.2 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220
Asus(1043 830F) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
2.15% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 1.3
2% 2.37 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.15%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sh00r480 GB 480GB
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 137 136 145 173 180 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22% Poor
Read 95.2
Write 52.7
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 148
20% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 11.4
4K Mixed 7.3
28% 8.9 MB/s
DQ Read 12.1
DQ Write 17.8
DQ Mixed 13.7
11% 14.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 22%
Great: 81%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
233GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 72 69 70 80 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 76.8
Write 41.5
Mixed 47.4
SusWrite 73.8
44% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 5.9
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.5
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-M61P-S3 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-M61P-S3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback