Asrock N68C-GS FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-GS FX  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '17 at 15:35
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 245
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
42.2% Average
Memory 70.2
1-Core 42.6
2-Core 84.1
43% 65.6 Pts
4-Core 85.2
8-Core 86.2
11% 85.7 Pts
64-Core 82.6
5% 82.6 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GSO
Gainward(10B0 0801) 384MB
Ram: 384MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
5.43% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 7.96
Parallax 2.47
6% 5.88 fps
MRender 6.76
Gravity 5.57
Splatting 4.83
5% 5.72 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.43%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asmt 2115 250GB
214GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 26.9
Write 27.1
Mixed 27.1
20% 27 MB/s
4K Read 6.05
4K Write 6.17
4K Mixed 6.78
1,120% 6.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 39%
Hitachi HDS728080PLAT20 82GB-$65
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PF2OA2AA Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 49.1
Write 50
Mixed 13.9
27% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.18
67% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HYMP125U72CP8-S6 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2 266 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.17 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 19%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-GS FX Builds (Compare 153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback