Asrock N68C-GS FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-GS FX  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '17 at 15:29
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 245
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
41.1% Average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 42.9
2-Core 86.1
43% 66.1 Pts
4-Core 77.1
8-Core 82.7
11% 79.9 Pts
64-Core 81.3
5% 81.3 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GSO
Gainward(10B0 0801) 384MB
Ram: 384MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
5.46% Terrible
Lighting 7.27
Reflection 7.65
Parallax 2.47
6% 5.8 fps
MRender 6.67
Gravity 5.53
Splatting 4.87
5% 5.69 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.46%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS728080PLAT20 82GB-$65
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PF2OA2AA Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
28% Poor
Read 49.6
Write 47.6
Mixed 45.8
36% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.04
43% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 28%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HYMP125U72CP8-S6 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2 266 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
13% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.73 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13%
Great: 19%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-GS FX Builds (Compare 155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback