Lenovo 90T100AFRI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics97.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90T100AFRI  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3741
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221021
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 26 '22 at 21:41
Run Duration75 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700F-$250
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 86.9
1-Core 195
2-Core 394
118% 225 Pts
4-Core 769
8-Core 1,386
129% 1,078 Pts
64-Core 1,385
86% 1,385 Pts
Poor: 99%
This bench: 115%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Legend(17AA 2088) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.3% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 113
Parallax 118
103% 119 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 103
Splatting 89.1
87% 109 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1001 1TB
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73102101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,753
Write 3,449
Mixed 2,580
725% 3,261 MB/s
4K Read 72.4
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 93.1
338% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,977
DQ Write 1491
DQ Mixed 1735
1,297% 1,734 MB/s
Poor: 184% Great: 573%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 37.4
113% 39.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 41.1
SC Mixed 30.2
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90T100AFRI Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

System: Lenovo 90T100AFRI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback