MSI 970A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7992)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7992
MotherboardMSI 970A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7992)  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '22 at 20:00
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9370-$183
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 80
1-Core 65.6
2-Core 129
56% 91.5 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 321
34% 272 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
AMD(1002 0B04) 2GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 31
Parallax 36.7
24% 32.6 fps
MRender 27.3
Gravity 27.7
Splatting 21.6
20% 25.5 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 307 328 350 217 284 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 59%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
168GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 89 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 87.5
Write 91.5
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 88.6
60% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 69%
WD WD3200AVCS-632DY1 320GB
223GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 67 67 66 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 60.7
Write 64.9
Mixed 48.1
SusWrite 66.1
44% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 50%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
220GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 123 123 125 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 112
Write 115
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 123
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 74%
ST950042 0AS 500GB
350GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 28 29 29 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 51.2
Write 26.4
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 27.8
40% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.8
45% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BD160BJ.M8F 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
47.1% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 16.6
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 12.4
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7992) Builds (Compare 193 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7992)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback