Google Lulu

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGoogle Lulu  (all builds)
MotherboardGOOGLE Lulu
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '22 at 09:58
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 61.5
2-Core 110
52% 82.8 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 160
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 155
10% 155 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 52%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Intel(8086 1616) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
3.95% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 6.1
3% 4.43 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 7.7
5% 6.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.95%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon L8H-256V2G-HP 256GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2803
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 257 266 269 271 267 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 404
Write 275
Mixed 254
SusWrite 266
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 19.8
68% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 181
162% 244 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4KTF25664HZ-1G6E1 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.3% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 12.7
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 12
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 86
46% 86 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Lulu Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Google Lulu

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback