MSI P67A-GD65 (MS-7681)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemMSI MS-7681
MotherboardMSI P67A-GD65 (MS-7681)  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '22 at 05:00
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 176
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 305
38% 290 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Asus(1043 838B) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 24.9
Parallax 17.2
15% 20.1 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 20.4
Splatting 18.1
17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU655 120GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XD0R024F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 127 132 129 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 286
Write 132
Mixed 152
SusWrite 127
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 33.2
4K Mixed 23.9
81% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 23
DQ Write 40.9
DQ Mixed 27.7
22% 30.5 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-2GBXL F3-12800CL9-2GBXL 4GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.7% Good
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 19.9
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 17.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P67A-GD65 (MS-7681) Builds (Compare 476 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI P67A-GD65 (MS-7681)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $604
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback