| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit väriä, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit väriä |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160106 |
| Uptime | 3 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 12 '17 at 09:45 |
| Run Duration | 99 Seconds |
| Run User | FIN-User |
| Background CPU | 24% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
51.9%
Above average
|
48% 76.7 Pts
|
30% 248 Pts
|
21% 333 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 590 (SLI Disabled)
Nvidia(10DE 0868) 1.5GB
CLim: 607 MHz, MLim: 853 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 385.69
|
29.8%
Poor
|
35% 33.6 fps
|
20% 25.1 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
32.6%
Below average
|
25% 111 MB/s
|
61% 24.7 MB/s
|
36% 63.9 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz
|
29.8%
Poor
|
29% 10.3 GB/s
|
22% 7.83 GB/s
|
39% 103 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 258 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 139x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 29x |
| FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 19x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 22x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 18x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $490 |