Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics68.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200107
Uptime8.5 Days
Run DateDec 25 '22 at 22:46
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 216
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 649
64% 526 Pts
64-Core 875
54% 875 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.2% Good
Lighting 89.4
Reflection 114
Parallax 68.1
73% 90.5 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 80
Splatting 70.8
59% 72.1 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900J13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 443 448 160 8.4 9.7 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.4% Below average
Read 194
Write 89.8
Mixed 77.4
SusWrite 240
34% 150 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 10.4
43% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 12.7
DQ Write 73.8
DQ Mixed 213
114% 100 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 96%
Maxtor OneTouch 750GB
495GB free, PID 7300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 61.8
Write 24.6
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 38.9
47% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
46% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 18
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback